Exactly 10 years ago, one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history happened near Kingston, Tennessee. Over a billion tons of coal ash spilled from a pit at a Tennessee Valley Authority plant into the Emory and Clinch rivers and surrounding land on Dec. 22, 2008.
Since then, the state and federal government have cracked down on TVA’s handling of coal ash pits, but the utility is still being questioned on whether it’s doing enough to prevent long-term environmental damage for communities that surround them.
A Legacy Of Coal Ash Embedded In Communities
In Humphreys County, Gary Bullwinkel often visits the campground he used to play at as a child. He’ll walk onto a creaky dock covered in red and green leaves and look beyond the Kentucky Reservoir.
“Anytime we ever swam, that was just part of our vista, the ash and the pollution,” he says.
That vista he’s referring to is a line of gray industrial buildings whining loudly in the distance. One among these isn’t making noise, but it stands out.
“A lot of coal comes through here, where you see that tall smoke stack,” he said. “That’s the Johnsonville Plant.”
Johnsonville is not longer operating. But for nearly 70 years, it burned coal and produced a toxic byproduct: coal ash. Up to 5 million cubic yards of it is now stored within a pit right in the middle of the Kentucky Reservoir, according to TVA. It’s classified as unlined, meaning there may be no protective layer between itself and the water.
Many residents are unaware of this, but others, like Bullwinkel, worry. Chemicals in coal ash, including elements like arsenic and lead, have been linked to health effects such as cancer and kidney failure,
according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
“If there were an accident, it would be damaging the local people’s use of the river and exposing them to dangers of coal ash they’re not informed about,” Bullwinkel says.
A Wake-Up Call For The Nation And State
The Johnsonville pit is one of a couple dozen across the state and over 1,000 in the nation, many of which are also unlined. Their potential dangers came to the forefront after the 2008 Kingston spill, when
coal ash burst from a TVA pit and smothered 300 acres of a nearby town with toxic muck.
But in 2015,
environmental groups sued TVA at its plant in Gallatin, saying that the pit was still leaking coal ash into the Cumberland River. In response, the state issued an order, requiring TVA formally investigate potential groundwater contamination at every one of its sites.
“Each of the different eight sites have an investigation plan that’s been approved,” Head says. “Once we get those in, we’ll figure out what’s the best corrective option.”
Around that same time, the federal Environmental Protection Agency also rolled out national coal ash regulations on unlined pits, requiring utilities to report water contamination data and start the process of either covering these pits up or removing them entirely.
The Cumberland Fossil Plant’s dry coal ash pit, in Stewart County
TVA Behind Other Utilities In Ash Management
But in Tennessee, TVA says it hasn’t finished those investigations required by the state. And it has released its final water monitoring data under the federal rule, either. So the ultimate fate Tennessee’s pits are still largely to be determined.
Scott Brooks, TVA spokesperson, says since Kingston, the utility has committed to converting its wet ash to dry ash throughout its network. He also says it’s building lined landfills to safely store any
new ash produced at operating plants, like Cumberland Fossil Plant in Stewart County.
“We’re installing even more monitoring wells, testing wells, so that we’ll have not only the historical data but new data coming out in the next year and half,” said Brooks.
But Amanda Garcia, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, believes new data is probably going to reveal science that is already known — leaving the ash in an unlined pit, even if it’s covered up — is going to contaminate water, she says.
“Years of groundwater monitoring data show that there are problems at many of these sites,” she says.
At TVA’s Allen plant in Memphis, for example, arsenic was found at 300 times the groundwater protection standard. TVA responded that the high levels likely came from a different source, not the coal ash pit.
Garcia accuses TVA of slow-walking the clean-up process. The utility — like most others across the nation — has typically said it prefers covering up pits and keeping them place, saying it can be done in a way that’s just as protective as moving the ash somewhere else. And moving can cost billions of dollars, as
Duke Energy in North Carolina told regulators.
But other major utilities have already started to reveal their water contamination data, and it paints a dire picture of coal ash contamination across the nation. Pits in 22 states are leaking excessively high levels of toxic chemicals into water,
according to documents acquired by Earth Justice. In South Carolina, several utilities have already decided to remove around 20 million tons of ash.
Garcia says it’s ironic that TVA is lagging behind other utilities, because its spill is what started the coal ash clean-up movement.
“Here we are 10 years later, and they still have leaking unlined coal ash ponds. The state can step in, and should step in, and identify places where it’s just too dangerous to the people of Tennessee to store coal ash the way TVA has been storing it.”
TVA says it’s not delaying, but simply waiting on more data and science to make an informed decisions. As a public entity, it says it has an obligation to its customers to make the best financial decision.
But the longer TVA waits to handle the ash properly, its critics say, the more it will cost generations to come.
On Air - 90.3 WPLN-FM